The Clifton (1 Whitechapel Road, London, E1 6TY) Considering the competition, this place does a poor job for the cuisine of the region. It is beyond banal; stale popadums kicked off a meal that continued in the same quality. The dhosa was essentially like a failed omlette/pancake with a recycled curry filling; the other three starters were also poorly realised and executed and all of the curries (we each tried a different one, and deliberately went for the non-standard dishes featured as the restaurant's “specials”) were deeply average. In this day and age, there is no excuse for such indifferent cooking. Completely disappointing. As for good looks, well compared perhaps to a canteen in Moose Bend, Indiana it might have interest value but beyond that it was utilitarian in the extreme.
Link to this reviewAugust 2009 | | Overall: | 5 |
|---|
| Food and Drink: | 3 |
|---|
| Service: | 7 |
|---|
| Atmosphere: | 5 |
|---|
| Value for Money: | 5 |
|---|
|
This review hasn't been rated yet. Was it helpful to you? | Request review removal |
Tayyabs (83 Fieldgate Street, London, London, E1 1JU) Among the best in London and in terms of the quality of the cooking, exceptional in any context. No prizes for glamour, but full prizes for the fantastic meats, sides and specials. Our friends' vegetarian daughter manages quite well with the menu, but for the carnivores amongst you, come often and come hungry. The blandly named “dry meat” was stunning but my favourite remains the tandoor prawns, many the size of a banker's bonus, and urad dhal with fenugreek. Partner's affection for their buttery peshwari naan directly responsible for substantial weight gain…at least that's his excuse.
Link to this reviewAugust 2009 | | Overall: | 9 |
|---|
| Food and Drink: | 10 |
|---|
| Service: | 8 |
|---|
| Atmosphere: | 8 |
|---|
| Value for Money: | 10 |
|---|
|
3 of 3 people found this review helpful. Was it helpful to you? | Request review removal |
Bodean's Fulham (4 Broadway Chambers, London, London, SW6 1EP) As someone who has relatives in the South and has stayed there over several long vacations, I struggle to reconcile the food served here with anything recognisable in my experience. The water-logged nachos started the meal on a low point, and pulled pork, one of nature's most sublime, unhealthiest and delicious treats on the planet, was … well let me put it this way. I wouldn't allow the chef responsible to leave the kitchen unescorted if there were any good 'ol boys in the neighbourhood. Hurt would be involved. We sent several dishes back which were too cold or terribly cooked to be fit for consumption by anyone, even under the influence of direct transfusions of Jack Daniels.
Link to this reviewJune 2009 | | Overall: | 3 |
|---|
| Food and Drink: | 1 |
|---|
| Service: | 5 |
|---|
| Atmosphere: | 5 |
|---|
| Value for Money: | 3 |
|---|
|
This review hasn't been rated yet. Was it helpful to you? | Request review removal |
Sukho Thai (855 Fulham Road, London, London, SW6 5HJ) My partner worked in Thailand for some time, and several friends who have lived in the region have come to dine here with us over the years. For my part, am a pretty expert Thai cook. So from that blended perspective, I can unreservedly say, the food is sensational. Yes, the portions are modest but the quality is stunning and that does compensate. The originality, sensitive seasoning and handling of the ingredients is first class. Every person who I have introduced to Sukho has come back independently to dine there, and I cannot remember ever having a disappointing meal.
Link to this reviewJune 2009 | | Overall: | 9 |
|---|
| Food and Drink: | 9 |
|---|
| Service: | 9 |
|---|
| Atmosphere: | 9 |
|---|
| Value for Money: | 9 |
|---|
|
1 of 1 people found this review helpful. Was it helpful to you? | Request review removal |
The Providores (109 Marylebone High Street, London, London, W1U 4RX) Providores used to be among my favourite breakfast haunts, but have to say in the last couple of months it has really disappointed. A particular favourite, creamed wild mushrooms and pancetta served on sourdough toast just got stingier and stingier (in quantity AND quality of the mushrooms) until the game was hardly worth the candle. The last time I was there, i ordered a totally a la carte breakfast to have everything served in separate dishes and not particularly warm, either. Plus parts of our group of three's orders were forgotten. The staff are really nice and try to be helpful but appear overwhelmed at breakfast time. When I was talking about it with a New Zealand colleague, he seconded my own experience and recommended a new place nearby. More worrying, having recommended the upstairs restaurant to some visitors and longer term residents a while back, one of my colleagues based in the area commented as well on their strong disappointment with the standard of cooking recently, which is a real shame. The NZ colleague said the chef who had inspired the food is not on the scene as much, and that might explain the fall-off in standards. As someone who has eaten there pretty regularly for the past 2-3 years, I hate the thought that my favourite breakfast spot is no longer the place it was. No doubt it will continue to attract people for its name, but fear it may lose regulars if it doesn't up its act.
Link to this reviewJune 2009 | | Overall: | 7 |
|---|
| Food and Drink: | 6 |
|---|
| Service: | 7 |
|---|
| Atmosphere: | 7 |
|---|
| Value for Money: | 6 |
|---|
|
1 of 1 people found this review helpful. Was it helpful to you? | Request review removal |
|
Great Queen Street (32 Great Queen Street, London, WC2B 5AA) The food was extremely uneven. The starters were a mix of quite good and very very average (the pomegranite and fennel salad). One of us had steak which was inedible and was taken back and off the bill. The mince pie was fine. Deserts had nice concepts that were, in the case of the Queen of Puddings, badly executed. It had been made in advance and lacked the crisp meringue finish it should have had. What really disappointed, though, was the staff and the way we were handled. When we arrived no-one told us, nor did they when we booked, that the table was needed back in two hours. Certainly the pace of our service did not suggest urgency. The first person we dealt with was quite remote and hard to interact with. The waiter was extremely knowledgeable but what was weird was that the restaurant was unable to offer any flexibility. We asked for some additional chips or some mash on the side, and were told chips were only served with the steak and mash was not available. I asked for ketchup, because the chips were as dry as dust on the inside, I was told “we don't do ketchup”. When the waiter cleared, he noted we hadn't eaten the chips and suggested the restaurant was right in not allowing us to order a separate portion with our pie, instead of asking why we didn't eat more than a few of them (particularly as one of us had a main course that had been returned to the kitchen because it was inedible). We were then told they wanted the table back while we were waiting for desert. When we went downstairs I asked to see the manager. He first claimed we had been told of the need to have the table at 930 when we booked, which was not the case. Had we been aware of a deadline we would have asked for our food to come more quickly. He then said we should have protested when we were asked to move (we were trying to be polite and my son works in the industry, understood the waiter was not happy about being asked to move us along). The bright spot of the evening was the bartender downstairs…
More
Link to this reviewMarch 2009 | | Overall: | 5 |
|---|
| Food and Drink: | 6 |
|---|
| Service: | 3 |
|---|
| Atmosphere: | 3 |
|---|
| Value for Money: | 3 |
|---|
|
1 of 1 people found this review helpful. Was it helpful to you? | Request review removal |